For biotech postdocs
Grantable learns the Specific Aims and Significance language of your subfield, then drafts and critiques your NIH and NSF sections against real scoring rubrics — not generic writing prompts.
From bullet points to fundable prose in three steps.
Paste your research summary, specific aims bullets, or preliminary data notes. No grant-writing experience required.
Grantable generates Specific Aims, Significance, and Innovation sections using the rubric language your study section expects — not boilerplate.
Grantable critiques its own output against NIH scoring criteria and proposes targeted revisions. You approve, redirect, or push back.
Grant writing assumes you know how to translate your science into reviewer language. Most postdocs are never taught that. Grantable closes the gap.
Studying off-target effects or base editing fidelity? Grantable knows the framing that Genome Editing study sections score well — and the Significance language that moves a reviewer from skeptical to fundable.
Translating molecular mechanism into biomedical significance is where most structural biology grants stall. Grantable bridges the gap between your cryo-EM data and the clinical relevance narrative reviewers expect.
Tumor microenvironment, T-cell exhaustion, checkpoint blockade — the jargon is dense and the competition fierce. Grantable helps you convey clinical relevance without overpromising to reviewers.
The Fellowship has specific structures for Research Plans and Personal Statements that most grad students only learn after being rejected once. Grantable maps your ideas to what reviewers are scoring on the first try.
Grantable is in private beta with a small group of biotech postdocs. Join the waitlist to be notified when your spot opens.